Can a Person Not Catch Chicken Pox From a Family Member Who Had an Active Case of It

You lot know about how individuals gain control of the power of the Land and then abuse that power similar one-time U.s.a. President George "Dubya" Bush?  "Dubya" started a war in Iraq which was highly profitable for some United states of america businesses.  He achieved this b y claiming Republic of iraq had a nuclear weapons programme which was a serious world security threat when Iraq did non and when it had already been bombed into oblivion by the war his Dad George Bush Snr waged on Iraq in 1992: Valerie Plame Wilson: the housewife CIA spy who was 'fair game' for Bush U.k. The Telegraph By Chrissy Iley 15 Feb 2011.

Remember how Bush was supported past UK Premier Tony Blair who helped past persuading the British Parliament to join the US with faked "intelligence" of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction which did not exist but which Blair claimed could be deployed within xl minutes and posed a serious security threat?

If yous think that then you volition know how these kinds of people manipulate the media.  Notice how they persuade united states of america we are in imminent danger of some threat or other and that they tin save the states all if nosotros trust them?

This trickery is not new.  Information technology had been used for well over a century with smallpox.  The myth continues to this twenty-four hour period.

On CHS we wrote previously almost how unscientific the claim is that smallpox was eradicated by vaccination when that frankly is nonsense scientifically.  The demise of the affliction came virtually as a result of the interaction of 3 completely different factors: isolation, attenuation and improved living conditions, particularly nutrition and sanitation. The effect cannot be attributable to the smallpox vaccine – any vaccine which takes over 100 years to work ipso facto proves itself not to have:

Modest Pox – Large Lie – Bioterrorism Implications of Flawed Theories of Eradication

There was a nasty disease called smallpox and it did kill people long ago.

This was peculiarly the instance when the poor moved to the cities during the industrial revolution looking for work and choked them in overcrowded unsanitary slums ripe for breeding and spreading disease: London's showtime park built afterward rich feared disease spread from slums United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland The Independent By Andy McSmith Fri 07 Nov 2008; Hygiene History in the Industrialized World.

The eye and upper classes needed to be reassured the Land would keep them safe from the threat of disease.  The bulk of the population of entire countries were persuaded their States could accomplish this by ensuring the then truly "bang-up unwashed" masses would be vaccinated and the disease controlled.  The trouble was this was a myth but the people wanted to believe and were persuaded.

Smallpox vaccination did not work and sometimes killed as many or more than the affliction itself whilst many of the "vaccinated" still contracted the disease: Smallpox Mortality, UK, Us, Sweden.

At present you can read a relatively short but well-referenced history of the myth of vaccination and the myth of its role in the eradication of smallpox:

Online Version – Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ by Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries MD – August 27, 2013

SMALLPOX MORTALITY- UK, Usa & SWEDEN

In the graphs below discover the large numbers of deaths acquired by the smallpox vaccine itself.  By 1901 in the UK, more people died from the smallpox vaccination than from smallpox itself.  The severity of the disease dimished with improved living standards and was non vanquished by vaccination, every bit the medical "consensus" view tells u.s.a.. Whatsoever vaccine which takes 100 years to "piece of work" did non.  On any scientific analysis of the history and data, crediting smallpox vaccine for the decline in smallpox appears misplaced.

When during 1880-1908 the Metropolis of Leicester in England stopped vaccination compared to the rest of the United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland and elsewhere, its survival rates soared and smallpox death rates plummeted [see table below].  Leicester's arroyo likewise cost far less.

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

Extracts from "LEICESTER: Sanitation versus Vaccination" By J.T. Biggs J.P.

[Download Unabridged Book as .pdf 43 Mb  – Or Read Online]

TABLE 21

SMALLPOX FATALITY RATES, cases in vaccinated and re-vaccinated populations compared with "unprotected" Leicester – 1860 to 1908.

Name.	Period.	Modest-Pox.  Cases	Small-Pox. Deaths.	Fatality-rate per cent. of Cases
Japan	1886-1908	288,779	77,415	26.8
British Army (Great britain)	1860-1908	1,355	96	vii.i
British Army (India)	1860-1908	2,753	307	11.1
British Army (Colonies)	1860-1908	934	82	8.eight
Royal Navy	1860-1908	two,909	234	viii.0
Grand Totals and instance fatality rate per cent, over all		296,730	78,134	26.3
Leicester (since giving upwardly vaccination)	1880-1908	one,206	61	5.1

Biggs said "In this comparing, I take given the numbers of revaccinated cases, and deaths, and each fatality-charge per unit separately and together, and then that they may be compared either way with Leicester. In pro-vaccinist linguistic communication, may I ask, if the excessive pocket-size-pox fatality of Japan, of the British Army, and of the Royal Navy, are non due to vaccination and revaccination, to what are they due? It would afford an interesting psychical study were we able to know to what heights of eloquent glorification Sir George Buchanan would have soared with a respective result—merely on the reverse side."

TABLE 29.

Pocket-size-Pox Epidemics, Cost, and Fatality Rates Compared

	Vaccinal Condition	Pocket-sized-Pox Cases	Pocket-sized-Pox Deaths	Fatality-rate Per Cent	Cost of Epidemic
London 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	9,659	1,594	16.l	£492,000
Glasgow 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	3,417	377	11.03	£ 150,000
Sheffield 1887-88	Well Vaccinated	7,066	688	9.73	£32,257
Leicester 1892-94	Practically Unvaccinated	393	21	5.34	£two,888
Leicester 1902-04	Practically Unvaccinated	731	30	4.x	£1,602

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Overstate – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

__________________________________________

Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ by Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries Doctor

– August 27, 2013

With the approaching flu season and the enthusiastic calls to apply the flu vaccine, you might be wondering where the idea of vaccination got its start. Where did the idea of injecting whole or $.25 of microbes and other substances into people in an try to provide protection against contagious affliction begin?

Many medical and history books nowadays a unproblematic tale of the origin of vaccination. Nigh nowadays the same basic tale of the brilliant observation of a simple state medico and his courage in attempting to thwart a mortiferous and frightening disease of that fourth dimension – smallpox, or equally it was often chosen the speckled monster. In a recent and popular book, The Panic Virus, the writer reiterates this classic tale.

In 1796, Jenner enlisted a milkmaid named Sarah Nelmes and an viii-yr one-time boy named James Phipps to test his theory. Jenner transferred pus from Nelmes'south cowpox blisters onto incisions he'd made in Phipps's hands. The boy came down with a slight fever, but nothing more. Later, Jenner gave Phipps a standard smallpox inoculation – which should have resulted in a full-blown, albeit mild, case of the disease. Zilch happened. Jenner tried inoculating Phipps with smallpox again; again, nothing. [i]

Edward Jenner's thought eventually became known as vaccination, which is derived from the Latin word for cow – vacca. It was originally referred to as cowpoxing, just somewhen the term vaccination was adopted. As the story goes, with this invention in place, smallpox would be tamed and the world would be freed from the terror of the illness.

Such is the stuff of legends. The story is non dissimilar the classic Greek legends of Theseus defeating the child-devouring Minotaur, or Perseus beheading the deadly snake-headed Medusa, or many other classic stories of the brave hero defeating a mortiferous enemy. The Jenner legend has been reduced to a simple and memorable story of a hero defeating the deadly enemy, smallpox. Authors claim that with vaccination in place, "billions of lives" have been saved.[two]

Just legendary heroes, particularly those that are used to support a belief, achieve an iconic status while any unsavory aspects about the hero and the story are ignored or forgotten. Mythical tales are designed to evoke a positive emotional response to influence societal thinking.

The tale of defeating smallpox begins well before the story of our hero. It begins with the concept of using pocket-size amounts of smallpox pus and scratching information technology into the arms of healthy people. This idea was introduced to the Western world by Lady Mary Wortley Montagu in 1717. She had returned from the Ottoman Empire with knowledge of the practice of inoculation against smallpox, known every bit variolation. This type of inoculation was simply a matter of infecting a person with smallpox at a time and in a setting of his choosing. The idea behind inoculation was that, in a controlled setting, people would practise better against the disease than if they contracted it at some possibly less desirable time and place in the time to come.

The idea was embraced by the medical profession and enthusiastically skillful. But because of the complexity and danger involved, inoculation remained an operation that could but exist afforded by the wealthy.[3] The procedure did oftentimes help protect the private that was inoculated, but at that place was all the same an estimated 2-5% that died equally a consequence.[4,5] Still, this was an comeback compared to a 20-25% mortality charge per unit in those that had naturally contracted smallpox during an epidemic.[6] But, was the divergence in bloodshed due to inoculation alone? Or could it have had something to do with the fact that the wealthy had better admission to more nutritious nutrient and a cleaner surround than the majority of club?

There was 1 major and mostly unacknowledged drawback to variolation – those inoculated could and did spread smallpox creating more deaths than there would take been naturally. In a 1764 article the writer recognized that smallpox was a contagious disease and that the practice of variolation would create new vectors to spread it. He compared the smallpox deaths in the 38 years before the introduction of variolation to the 38 years after, and plant that smallpox deaths had increased⎯not decreased. He was forced to conclude that variolation on the whole, led to worse problems, because it caused more deaths than lives saved.

It is incontestably like the plague a contagious affliction, what tends to stop the progress of the infection tends to lessen the danger that attends it; what tends to spread the contagion, tends to increment that danger; the practice of Inoculation manifestly tends to spread the contagion, for a contagious illness is produced past Inoculation where it would not otherwise take been produced; the identify where it is thus produced becomes a heart of contagion, whence it spreads not less fatally or widely than it would spread from a center where the disease should happen in a natural way; these centers of contamination are evidently multiplied very profoundly by Inoculation . . .[vii]

However, while the popularity of variolation varied, the problem of information technology spreading smallpox, was largely unrecognized. Because variolation had become a very lucrative procedure it was enthusiastically continued past virtually of the medical profession through the 1700s and into the early 1800s. Smallpox connected to be spread by this medically-sanctioned process.

Now enters the hero of our legend. Information technology was rumored amid milkmaids that infection with cowpox would protect one from smallpox. In 1796, believing these stories, Edward Jenner performed an experiment on an viii-year-onetime boy named James Phipps. He took affliction matter that he believed to be cowpox from lesions on a dairymaid, Sarah Nelmes, and vaccinated James Phipps with it. He later deliberately exposed the child to smallpox as a test to run across if he was protected by the cowpox inoculation. When the male child did not contract clinical smallpox, it was assumed that the technique of vaccination was successful.

In 1798 Jenner published his results claiming lifelong protection confronting smallpox using his discovery with but rumors to support his contention. While he promoted the use of his technique based on the tale that someone infected with cowpox would be immune to smallpox, in that location were doctors of the time who challenged this myth, because they had seen smallpox follow cowpox. At a meeting of the Physician-Convivial Order, Jenner was ridiculed over his practice.

Just he [Jenner] no sooner mentioned it than they laughed at it. The cow doctors could take told him of hundreds of cases where small-pox had followed cow-pox . . . [8]

From the outset at that place were bug with Jenner's process. In 1799, Mr. Drake vaccinated a number of children with cowpox affair obtained from Edward Jenner. The children were so tested by being inoculated with smallpox to see if the cowpox process had been effective. All of them developed smallpox, and vaccination failed to protect any of them. Jenner received the written report but decided to ignore the results because they were non in support of his theory.[nine]

Vaccination was quickly embraced by many in the medical profession every bit the answer to combating smallpox. By 1801, an estimated 100,000 people had already been vaccinated in England with the belief that the procedure would produce lifelong protection. The medical community continued to encompass Jenner'due south ideas amid numerous accounts that refuted the theory of vaccination. Early reports indicated that there were cases of people who had cowpox, or were vaccinated, and were withal dying of smallpox. Specific cases of cowpox and vaccine failure were reported in the 1809 Medical Observer.

A Child was vaccinated past Mr. Robinson, surgeon and apothecary, at Rotherham, towards the end of the year 1799. A calendar month later it was inoculated with minor-pox matter without effect, and a few months later on took confluent small-pox and died. ii. A adult female-servant to Mr. Chance, of Bungay, in Suffolk, had cow-pox in the casual way from milking. Seven years later on she became nurse to Yarmouth Hospital, where she defenseless small-scale-pox, and died. three and 4. Elizabeth and John Nicholson, 3 years of age, were vaccinated at Battersea in the summer of 1804. Both contracted small-scale-pox in May, 1805 and died . . . 13. The kid of Mr. R died of small-pox in October 1805. The patient had been vaccinated, and the parents were assured of its security. The vaccinator's name was concealed. 14. The child of Mr. Hindsley at Mr. Adam's role . . . died of small-pox a year after vaccination.[ten]

Reports through the early 1800s began to accrue showing vaccination was non living up to its promise to protect from smallpox. A written report in 1810 from the Medical Observer noted 535 cases of modest-pox after vaccination, 97 fatal cases, and 150 cases of vaccine injuries.[11] Annotation that 97 deaths out of 535 cases is an 18% fatality rate and is essentially the same fatality rate as smallpox before vaccination was introduced. This high fatality rate forth with 150 vaccine-related injuries was a direct challenge to this new and highly lauded medical process.

Some other article in 1817 reflected the reality of vaccination failure.

. . . the number of all ranks suffering nether Small Pox, who take previously undergone Vaccination past the nigh skillful practitioners, is at nowadays alarmingly great.[12]

In 1818 Thomas Brown, a surgeon with 30 years of experience in Musselburgh, Scotland, published an commodity discussing his experience with vaccination. He stated that he was originally extremely positive in promoting vaccination and that no one in the medical profession "could outstrip me in zeal for promoting vaccine practice." But after vaccinating 1,200 persons, he became disappointed in the promise of vaccination. His experience was that, after vaccination, people however could contract and even die from smallpox, and that he could no longer support the practise.[13]

Like today, surgeons and doctors of the time were amply compensated for performing vaccination and thus had a tendency to embrace it every bit a new form of income. It is therefore quite pregnant for a doctor to have spoken out against it equally Dr. Dark-brown did.

Connected observations showed that smallpox could nevertheless infect those who previously had smallpox and that those who were vaccinated could also be infected.

. . . during the years 1820, 1, and, 2 [1820-1822] there was a great hubbub nigh the small-pox. It bankrupt out with the swell epidemic to the due north . . . It pressed close to domicile to Dr. Jenner himself . . . It attacked many who had had small-pox before, and oft severely; nearly to death; and of those who had been vaccinated, it left some alone, but brutal upon great numbers.[xiv]

William Cobbett was a farmer, journalist, and English pamphleteer. In 1829 he wrote about the failure of vaccination to protect people from smallpox. Cobbett considered vaccination to be an unproven and fraudulent medical practice. He noted that:

. . . hundreds of instances, persons cow-poxed by JENNER HIMSELF, take taken the real small-pox afterwards, and have either died from the disorder, or narrowly escaped with their lives![xv]

During this fourth dimension vaccine material was the "humanized" form, which meant that fabric was taken from the arm of a previously vaccinated person to vaccinate the adjacent person. Arm-to-arm vaccination connected for decades, but as failures increased there was a belief that the vaccine had lost its original supposed potency, and there were calls to obtain fresh textile directly from cows.[16]

While the fable maintained that the vaccine textile came from cows, Jenner actually believed the material originated from an infectious condition of horses called the "grease." From this and other beliefs, there were many attempts to recreate an original moo-cow-based vaccine. All these attempts failed.[17] Some believed that cowpox was merely smallpox that was passed through cows and somehow fabricated into a new disease.[xviii] This faulty belief would event in the creation of more smallpox epidemics.

In 1836 in Attenborough, Massachusetts, Dr. John C. Martin took fluid from the pock of a homo who died from smallpox and inoculated it onto a moo-cow'due south udder. He then took pus from that cow and used information technology to vaccinate people. A large smallpox epidemic ensued causing panic and sickness in many people over the subsequent months.[nineteen] A later inquiry determined that this was naught more than the old practice of smallpox inoculation.[20]

Not but was vaccination declining and causing smallpox epidemics, but at that place were also reports of deaths from other causes presently later vaccination. For example, a skin condition called erysipelas was a particularly prolonged and painful way to dice.

. . . a boy from Somers-town, anile five years, "minor-pox confluent, unmodified (9 days)." He had been vaccinated at the historic period of iv months; one cicatrix . . . the married woman of a labourer, from Lambeth, aged 22 years, "small-scale-pox confluent, unmodified (8 days)." Vaccinated in infancy in Suffolk; two adept cicatrices . . . the son of a mariner, anile 10 weeks, and the son of a sugar bakery, aged 13 weeks, died of "general erysipelas after vaccination, effusion of the brain."[21]

Considering arm-to-arm vaccination was being used, other diseases could exist spread causing various epidemics. Infectious diseases attributed to vaccination included tuberculosis and syphilis. In 1863 Dr. Ricord spoke before the University at Paris.

Offset I rejected the idea that syphilis could be transplanted by vaccination. Just facts accumulated more and more, and now I must concede the possibility of the transfer of syphilis by means of the vaccine. I do this very reluctantly. At present I exercise non hesitate longer to admit and proclaim the reality of the fact.[22]

Every bit information technology became increasingly clear throughout the 1800s to more doctors and citizens that vaccination was not what it was promised to be, refusals increased. In gild to deal with this, the judicial system intervened. In 1855, Massachusetts created a set up of comprehensive laws providing for widespread vaccination.[23]

These laws and compulsory vaccination did goose egg to curb the trouble of smallpox. Information from Boston that begins in 1811 shows that, starting effectually 1837, there were periodic smallpox epidemics that culminated in the neat 1872 epidemic. Later on 1855, there were further smallpox epidemics in 1859-threescore, 1864-65, and 1867 and the infamous epidemic in 1872-73. This was the nearly severe smallpox epidemic since the introduction of vaccination.[24] These repeat smallpox epidemics showed that the strict vaccination laws instituted by Massachusetts in 1855 had no effect at all (Graph i). In fact, more people died in the 20 years after the strict Massachusetts vaccination compulsory laws than in the 20 years before.

Graph 1: Boston smallpox mortality rate from 1841 to 1880.

By this signal, the medical profession no longer claimed lifelong protection against smallpox from a single vaccination. Instead, claims were made that vaccination fabricated smallpox less likely to kill or that smallpox would exist milder. Calls were then made for revaccination. Claims were made that revaccination had to be performed anywhere from yearly to every 10 years.[25]

While the majority of the medical profession supported vaccination, there were those that spoke out against the procedure. Dr. Longstaffe, a prominent medico of Edinburgh England noted that huge profits were being made by vaccinators. Immense financial gain combined with the force of constabulary created the perfect environment that would impose vaccination upon the citizens of the Western world.

The public vaccinators have received immense sums from Parliament . . . In 1850 solitary they amounted to £54,727, and in the nowadays year they will get well-nigh a quarter one thousand thousand. Other sums, also, which I cannot name, have been granted for the purpose of sustaining this monstrous fraud. Has ever a quack remedy produced so much proceeds?

[26]

In England, governmental control strengthened over the years, with progressively stricter laws designed to enforce vaccination. Laws previously passed in 1840 and 1853 were consolidated into oppressive compulsory laws in 1867 that included fines for parents who did not vaccinate their children. Even so, through the 1800s, periodic smallpox epidemics continued to occur. A great pandemic struck in 1872 and took the lives of thousands, even those who were vaccinated.

Every recruit that enters the French army is vaccinated. During the Franco-Prussian state of war in that location were twenty-three grand iv hundred and 60-nine cases of small-pox in that regular army. The London Lancet of July xv, 1871 said:

Of 9 yard three hundred and ninety-two small-pox patients in London hospitals, six thousand viii hundred and fifty-four had been vaccinated. Seventeen and one-half per cent of those attacked died. In the whole land more than one hundred and twenty-two thousand vaccinated persons have suffered from small-pox . . . Official returns from Germany show that between 1870 and 1885 1 million vaccinated persons died from small-pox.[27]

Concerns over vaccine prophylactic, effectiveness, and governmental infringement on personal liberty and liberty through compulsory vaccination stoked the fires of the anti-vaccine movement. People began to resist the government and chose to pay fines. Some fifty-fifty accepted imprisonment rather than assuasive vaccination for themselves or their children. The public backlash culminated in the great demonstration in Leicester England, in 1885. That aforementioned year Leicester'southward regime, which had pushed for vaccination through the employ of fines and jail fourth dimension, was replaced with a new government that was opposed to compulsory vaccination. By 1887, the vaccination coverage rates had dropped to 10%.[28]

Instead of relying on vaccination, people began to rely on proper sanitation, quarantine of smallpox patients and thorough disinfection of their homes. They believed this technique was a cheap and effective means that eliminated the demand for vaccination. Nevertheless, there were dire predictions from the majority of the medical customs that strongly endorsed vaccination and believed the depression vaccination rate would effect in a terrible "massacre," especially in the "unprotected" children.[29]

Despite such prophesies of doom from the medical profession, the majority of the town'southward residents were steadfast in their belief that vaccination was not necessary to control smallpox. The prophecy that the Leicester residents would eventually be plagued with disaster never did come to laissez passer. Low vaccination rates resulted in lower smallpox rates and deaths, than in well-vaccinated towns.[30] In fact, the lower vaccination rates correlated to an overall decrease in smallpox deaths (Graph two). Leicester showed that by abandoning vaccination in favor of what became termed as the "Leicester Method," deaths from smallpox were far lower than when vaccination rates were high.

The experience of unvaccinated Leicester is an eye-opener to the people and an centre-sore to the pro-vaccinists the world over. Hither is a groovy manufacturing town having a population of well-nigh a quarter of a million, which has demonstrated by a crucial test of an experience extending over a period of more than a quarter of a century, that an unvaccinated population has been far less susceptible to small-pox and far less afflicted by that illness since it abandoned vaccination than information technology was at a fourth dimension when 90-v per cent of its births were vaccinated and its adult population well re-vaccinated.[31]

While vaccination was often promoted as a prophylactic process, information technology often caused sickness or even death. From 1859 to 1922 official deaths related to vaccination were more 1,600 in England (Graph 3). In fact, from 1906 to 1922 the number of deaths recorded from smallpox vaccination and smallpox were approximately the same (Graph 4).

Graph 2: Leicester England smallpox bloodshed rate vs. vaccination coverage from 1838 to 1910.

Graph 3: England and Wales total deaths from cowpox and other effects of vaccination from 1859 to 1922.

Graph 4: England and Wales smallpox deaths vs. vaccination deaths from 1906 to 1922

At the terminate of the 1800s, smallpox inverse its character. After the summer of 1897, the severe type of smallpox with its high expiry rate, with rare exception, had entirely disappeared from the United States. Smallpox turned from a affliction that killed ane in 5 of its victims to one that just killed anywhere from 1 in 50 and after to as low as 1 in 380. The illness could still kill, but having become then much milder, it was oftentimes mistaken for various other pox infections or skin eruptions.

During 1896 a very balmy type of smallpox began to prevail in the South and later gradually spread over the country. The mortality was very low and it [smallpox] was usually at commencement mistaken for chicken pox. . .[32]

The author of a 1913 commodity in The Periodical of Infectious Diseases presented a table showing that in 1895 and 1896 the smallpox death charge per unit was around xx%, as it had been historically. The table also showed that after 1896 the death rate fell off chop-chop, starting with 6% in 1897 to as low as 0.26% by 1908. As the mild course of smallpox replaced the classic type, smallpox could exist difficult to tell from chickenpox, which was, by this fourth dimension, considered a mild disease of childhood.

. . . chickenpox, is a minor catching disease of childhood, and is chiefly important because it frequently gives ascension to difficulty in diagnosis in cases of balmy smallpox. Smallpox and chickenpox are sometimes very difficult to differentiate clinically.[33]

By the 1920s it was recognized that the new form of smallpox produced little in the way of symptoms, even though few had been vaccinated.

Individual cases, or even epidemics, occur in which, although there has been no protection by vaccination, the course of the disease is extremely balmy. The lesions are few in number or entirely absent, and the constitutional symptoms mild or insignificant.[34]

Despite this extremely low vaccine coverage rate, in that location was never a resurgence of smallpox. Even though smallpox was not a major issue, the practice of smallpox vaccination continued from the time of the last smallpox decease in the United states of america in 1948 up until 1963. This resulted in an estimated 5,000 unnecessary vaccine-related hospitalizations from generalized rash, secondary infections, and encephalitis.

A 1958 study detailed the cases of ix children in which two died of a peel status due to vaccination, at present being termed eczema vaccinatum. The occurrence of this disease was estimated by the authors to be between one in xx,000 to 1 in 100,000 with a fatality charge per unit of 4 to xl%.[35] Nevertheless, they acknowledged that most cases were not reported and at that place was no accurate accounting on this consequence of vaccination. There were also an estimated 200 to 300 deaths as the outcome of smallpox vaccination, while during the same time there had only been one smallpox death in 1948.[36]

The last smallpox death in the Usa post-obit an importation occurred in 1948, merely since that time there have been probably 200 to 300 deaths from smallpox vaccination.[37]

Eczema vaccinatum is still occurring today, every bit recently noted in the news. A toddler was infected by his military machine father after the father was vaccinated. Subsequently a prolonged access, and a week of experimental treatments including immune globulin from donor blood and antiviral medication, the toddler recovered. The mother also required handling and virus was found all over the house.[38]

Because of poor surveillance and vaccine reaction underreporting, the authors of a 1970 study thought that the number of smallpox vaccine-related deaths could actually have been even college. This study only examined deaths from 1959 to 1968 in the U.s.a.. If the deaths were this loftier in a state with a modernistic health-intendance organization, what was the full number of deaths from smallpox vaccination from 1800 to the present beyond the entire world?

There were those in the medical customs who were relieved that the failure of compulsory vaccination never gained much public scrutiny. Instead, the focus was shifted to new types of vaccinations.

Compulsory vaccination which once had the suffrage of the nation has now hardly a serious supporter. Nosotros are ashamed to jettison the idea completely and perhaps afraid that if nosotros did the accident of some future epidemic might put us in the wrong. Nosotros prefer to let compulsory vaccination die a natural death and are relieved that the general public is not curious enough to demand an inquest. In the concurrently our attention is diverted to other and newer forms of immunisation.[39]

During this time with vaccination as virtually the only medically promoted fashion to deal with disease, in that location were doctors finding amazing successes with smallpox using other methods. Vinegar is a common food product that is fabricated through fermentation of a variety of sources. An 1877 article described the success that Dr. Roth had using vinegar for smallpox prophylaxis.

D. Thousand. Oliphant, 1000.D., of Toronto, Canada, having read the article on the utilise of Acetic acrid in cerise fever, writes of a "vinegar cure" as applied to small pox. Dr. Roth first claimed wonderful success in treatment regarding vinegar more reliable as a rubber in pocket-size-pox than Belladonna in cherry-red fever. Dr. Roth gave both to the sick and to the exposed two tabular array-spoonfuls of vinegar, after breakfast and at evening, for fourteen days. Few persons thus treated took the affliction at all. None who adopted the prophylactic handling died, while among those under ordinary treatment the bloodshed was every bit usual.[xl]

In 1899 Dr. Howe too demonstrated vinegar'due south ability to protect a person from acquiring smallpox. Those who used the vinegar protocol were able to take intendance of other people with smallpox without fright of contracting the disease. The author notes that despite several hundred exposures, vinegar was protective against smallpox and was considered an "established fact."[41]

Again, in 1901 professor MacLean promoted the idea of vinegar as a real preventative of smallpox. Dr. MacLean claimed that apple cider vinegar and no other type of vinegar should exist used 3 or four times a day to protect a person from contracting smallpox.

J.P. MacLean Ph. D., the renowned "anti" Secretarial assistant of the Western Reserve Historical Society, having readily overthrown the conclusions of all the great men who for a century past accept been convinced of the efficacy of vaccination for the prevention of smallpox, now comes to the front end in the newspapers with the real preventative. "Whatsoever person who has been exposed need have no fearfulness of smallpox if he will take two or three tablespoonfuls of pure cider vinegar three or 4 times a day." The word may now be regarded as closed, and smallpox at last is conquered![42]

Apple cider vinegar might seem silly, only only considering most people take been conditioned to accept the age-old prophylaxis for smallpox: raw, disease-laden, contaminated pus scrapings from an infected animal's (usually a cow) belly, diluted in glycerin, and scratched into the human arm with a metal prong until the arm was raw and bleeding. What seems sillier at present?

Scurvy is a affliction that results from a deficiency of vitamin C due to starvation or only an extremely poor or unbalanced nutrition. Vitamin C is essential for the formation of salubrious collagen. Collagen is the protein that forms connective tissue in skin, bones, and blood vessels and also gives support to internal organs. In scurvy, the body is not able to generate acceptable collagen or extracellular matrix proteins that serve as mortar holding cells together and, as a result, literally comes unglued and falls apart.

William A. Guy, dean of the Medical Department of King's College, described the poor diet of gilded miners in California in the 1850s. Thousands of miners subsisted on meat, fatty, coffee, and alcohol while working long, difficult days under the unrelenting California sun. The vitamin C-deficient diet led many to develop scurvy.

Scurvy has been very prevalent among the gilt miners of California . . . the emigrants upon the overland journeys and at the mines, as living virtually entirely upon fried bacon or fat pork and flour made into batter-cakes, and fried in the fat, which completely saturates it. This is done down with copious librations of strong java, and large quantities of brandy or whiskey are taken in the intervals of the meals . . . this has been the nutrition of thousands for months, under a scorching dominicus, when the temperature was over a hundred in the shade, the men being at the aforementioned fourth dimension subjected to the most intense labour.[43]

Although many died of cholera during the California Gold Rush of the mid-1800s, an estimated 10,000 men died from scurvy.

During the American Ceremonious War twice as many died from nutritional deficiency related diseases every bit those killed in battle.[44] For instance, the causes of death listed for Indiana soldiers buried at the National Cemetery in Andersonville, Georgia, shows that diarrhea and scurvy directly accounted for at to the lowest degree two-thirds.[45] Dysentery was the next common cause of death, with the infamous diseases such as smallpox, typhus, pneumonia, and gangrene responsible for only a small fraction. Those who were killed in actual boxing or who died as a event of their wounds deemed merely for one percent of the full deaths.

Other large infectious killers such every bit scarlet fever, measles, diphtheria, and whooping cough (also known equally pertussis) all greatly declined during this fourth dimension to where they were either completely eliminated or considered mild childhood illnesses by the mid-1900s. This massive decline of 99% of deaths in whooping cough and measles occurred before vaccines or antibiotics were available (Graph 5 & 6).

Graph 5: England and Wales whooping cough mortality rate from 1838 to 1978.

Graph six: England and Wales measles mortality rate from 1838 to 1978.

The fairytale legend of a country dr. making a discovery that saved the earth from the devastation of smallpox is a fundamental medical belief that continues to be echoed by indoctrinated and naïve doctors whenever vaccines are challenged. Smallpox vaccine, in the minds of medical professionals remains a pillar of their vaccine faith. Only the truthful history shows us a unlike reality.

The brand name of vaccination was indoctrinated into the world psyche every bit something to protect someone from an illness. This conventionalities spawned off numerous other ideas using the same notion of injecting whole or parts of illness matter into living beings in attempts to protect them from a specific illness. The reality of vaccination is cipher close to the myth.

Other extremely effective alternative methods of sanitation, diet, apple tree cider vinegar, and other solutions were ignored and have since vanished from societal collective memory. Instead we were left with the mythical history of Jenner's great discovery and the continued onslaught of dangerous vaccines to newborn infants. Vaccines are now a regular affair from cradle to grave, all in the proper noun of supposedly healthier people. Now that the curtain has been pulled back on the origins of vaccination, do more than and more than vaccines seem like a good idea to you lot?

More information on the history of vaccination including polio, measles, whooping cough, and lost remedies can exist found in Dr Humphries' and Roman Bystrianyk's book "Dissolving Illusions" which can exist establish on amazon.com

Bibliography:
1.Seth Mnookin, The Panic Virus, Simon & Schuster, 2011, p. 31.
ii.Science the Definitive Visual Guide, DK Publishing, 2009, p. 156.
3.Victor C. Vaughan, Md, Epidemiology and Public Wellness, St. Louis, C.V. Mosby Visitor, 1922, p. 189.
4.Frederick F. Cartwright, Disease and History, Rupert-Hart-Davis, London, 1972, p. 124.
v.William Douglass, MA, A Summary, Historical and Political, of the Starting time Planting, Progressive Improvements and Present State of the British Settlements of N-America, London, 1760, p. 398.
6.Ann Jannetta, The Vaccinators: Smallpox Medical Cognition and the 'Opening' of Japan, Stanford University Press, 2007, p.179.
vii."The Practice of Inoculation Truly Stated," The Gentleman'due south Mag and Historical Chronicle, vol. 34, 1764, p. 333.
8.Dr. Walter Hadwen, The Case Confronting Vaccination, Goddard's Rooms, Gloucester, Jan 25, 1896, p. 12.
9.Charles Creighton, Jenner and Vaccination, 1889, pp. 95-96.
x.William Scott Tebb, MD, A Century of Vaccination and What it Teaches, Swan Sonnenschein & Co., London, 1898, p. 126.
11."Vaccination past Deed of Parliament," Westminster Review, vol. 131, 1889, p. 101.
12."Observations on Prevailing Diseases," The London Medical Repository Monthly Journal and Review, vol. Viii, July-December, 1817, p. 95.
thirteen.Mr. Thomas Chocolate-brown, Surgeon Musselburgh, "On the Present State of Vaccination," The Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Periodical, Volume Fifteenth, 1819, p. 67.
14."Observations past Mr. Fosbroke," The Lancet, vol. Ii, 1829, p. 583.
fifteen.William Cobbett, Advice to Immature Men and (Incidentally) to Young Women, 1829, London, pp. 224-225.
sixteen.Dr. Delagrange of Paris, "On the Nowadays State of Vaccination in France," The Lancet, vol. Two, 1829, p. 582.
17."Cowpox Origin of," The Medico-chirurgical review and periodical of practical medicine, vol. 20, 1834, p. 504.
eighteen.Dr. Fiard, "Experiments upon the Communication and Origin of Vaccine Virus," London medical and surgical periodical, vol. iv, 1834, p. 796.
nineteen.Ephraim Cutter, MD, "Partial Report on the Production of Vaccine Virus in the United states of america," Transactions of the American Medical Association, vol. XXIII, 1872, p. 200.
20.Encyclopaedia Britannica, vol. 24, Philadelphia, 1890, p. 25.
21.The Morning Chronicle, Wednesday, April 12, 1854.
22."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
23.Susan Wade Peabody, "Historical Study of Legislation Regarding Public Health in the State of New York and Massachusetts," The Journal of Infectious Diseases, Supplement no. 4, February 1909, p. 50-51.
24."Small-pox and Revaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, vol. CIV, no. 6, Feb x, 1881, p. 137.
25.Dr. Olesen, "Vaccination in the Philippine Islands," Medical Sentinel, April 1911, vol. 19, no. 4, p. 255.
26."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
27.G. W. Harman, MD, "A Physician's Argument Confronting the Efficacy of Virus Inoculation," Medical Cursory: A Monthly Journal of Scientific Medicine and Surgery: vol. 28, no. one, 1900, p. 84.
28.The Parliamentary Debates, vol. CCCXXVI, June i, 1888, p. 933.
29."A Demonstration Against Vaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, Apr 16, 1885, p. 380.
30.J. W. Hodge, Medico, "Prophylaxis to be Realized Through the Attainment of Wellness, Not by the Propagation of Disease," The St. Louis Medical and Surgical Journal, vol. LXXXIII, July 1902, p. 15.
31.J. Due west. Hodge, MD, "How Modest-Pox was Banished from Leicester," Twentieth Century Mag, vol. Three, no. xvi, January, 1911, p. 342.
32.Charles 5. Chapin, "Variation in Type of Infectious Disease every bit Shown by the History of Smallpox in the United States," The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 13, no. 2, September 1913, p. 173.
33.John Gerald Fitzgerald, Peter Gillespie, Harry Mill Lancaster, An introduction to the practice of preventive medicine, C.V. Mosby Visitor, 1922, p. 197.
34.John Cost Crozer Griffith, The diseases of infants and children, Volume one, W.B. Saunders Visitor, 1921, p. 370.
35.Audrey H. Reynolds Md and Howard A. Joos MD, Exczema Vaccinatum, Pediatrics, Baronial 1958, pp. 259-267
36.David Koplow, Smallpox: The Right to Eradicate a Global Scourge, 2004, University of California Press, p.21.
37.The Yale journal of biology and medicine, 1968, vol. 41, p. 10.
38.Maggie Fox, 2007, Toddler Survives Smallpox Vaccine Reaction, Reuters.
39.Dr. Charles Cyril Okell, "From a bacteriological dorsum-number," Lancet, Jan ane, 1938, pp. 48-49.
forty."Acetic Acrid in Scarlet Fever," American homoeopathist—A Monthly Journal of Medical Surgical and Sanitary Science, vol. 1, no. 1, July 1877, p. 73.
41."Vinegar to Forbid Smallpox," The Critique, Jan xv, 1899, p. 289.
42.Cleveland Periodical of Medicine, vol. 6, no. 1, 1901, p. 58.
43.William A. Guy, "Lectures on Public Health. Addressed to the Students of the Theological Department of King's College," Medical Times, vol. 23, January 4 to June 28, 1851, p. 283.
44.Roy Porter, The Greatest Benefit to Flesh, Harper Collins, New York, 1997, p. 399.
45.Written report of the Unveiling And Dedication of Indiana Monument at Andersonville, Georgia (National Cemetery), November 26 1908, pp. 73-102.

Filed nether: ADHD, Aspergers, autism, Child Health Safety, MMR, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine courtroom, Vaccine Damage, Vaccines | Tagged: ADHD, Anti-vaccine Safety, Aspergers, autism, Cervarix, Gardasil, government, Health, HPV, HPV vaccine, medicine, mercury, MMR, politics, scientific discipline, thimerosal, thiomersal, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine court, Vaccine Harm, Vaccines |

evansreplignigh.blogspot.com

Source: https://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2013/12/23/smallpox-eradication-one-of-historys-biggest-lies-how-vaccination-did-not-eradicate-smallpox/

Share this post